↓ Skip to main content

Application of orange essential oil as an antistaphylococcal agent in a dressing model

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
11 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Application of orange essential oil as an antistaphylococcal agent in a dressing model
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-12-125
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arunachalam Muthaiyan, Debabrata Biswas, Philip G Crandall, Brian J Wilkinson, Steven C Ricke

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is the pathogen most often and prevalently involved in skin and soft tissue infections. In recent decades outbreaks of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) have created major problems for skin therapy, and burn and wound care units. Topical antimicrobials are most important component of wound infection therapy. Alternative therapies are being sought for treatment of MRSA and one area of interest is the use of essential oils. With the increasing interest in the use and application of natural products, we screened the potential application of terpeneless cold pressed Valencia orange oil (CPV) for topical therapy against MRSA using an in vitro dressing model and skin keratinocyte cell culture model.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Unknown 112 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 17%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Researcher 12 11%
Other 7 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 33 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 16%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 36 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2015.
All research outputs
#2,754,038
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#490
of 3,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,236
of 149,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#14
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.