You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of technology-enhanced teaching and assessment methods of undergraduate preclinical dental skills: a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12909-020-02211-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Khaled Khalaf, Mohamed El-Kishawi, Shahd Mustafa, Sausan Al Kawas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 28% |
| Unknown | 25 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 35% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2020.
All research outputs
#18,741,816
of 23,232,430 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,816
of 3,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,453
of 398,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#53
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,232,430 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.