↓ Skip to main content

Neuroexcitatory effects of morphine-3-glucuronide are dependent on Toll-like receptor 4 signaling

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuroexcitatory effects of morphine-3-glucuronide are dependent on Toll-like receptor 4 signaling
Published in
Journal of Neuroinflammation, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1742-2094-9-200
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael R Due, Andrew D Piekarz, Natalie Wilson, Polina Feldman, Matthew S Ripsch, Sherry Chavez, Hang Yin, Rajesh Khanna, Fletcher A White

Abstract

Multiple adverse events are associated with the use of morphine for the treatment of chronic non-cancer pain, including opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH). Mechanisms of OIH are independent of opioid tolerance and may involve the morphine metabolite morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G). M3G exhibits limited affinity for opioid receptors and no analgesic effect. Previous reports suggest that M3G can act via the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)/myeloid differentiation protein-2 (MD-2) heterodimer in the central nervous system to elicit pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 75 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 23%
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 6 8%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 14%
Neuroscience 10 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Engineering 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 19 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2023.
All research outputs
#8,269,042
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#1,375
of 2,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,673
of 178,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#19
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.