You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Pulse contour analysis: Is it able to reliably detect changes in cardiac output in the haemodynamically unstable patient?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc9381 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lester AH Critchley |
| Abstract |
Three pulse contour systems for monitoring cardiac output - LiDCO Plus™, PiCCO Plus™ and FloTrac™ - were compared in postcardiac surgery patients. None of the three methods demonstrated good trending ability according to concordance analysis. Pulse contour systems remain unreliable in the haemodynamically unstable patient. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 23% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 77% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 19% |