↓ Skip to main content

Combining angiotensin receptor blockers with chlorthalidone or hydrochlorothiazide – which is the better alternative? A meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combining angiotensin receptor blockers with chlorthalidone or hydrochlorothiazide – which is the better alternative? A meta-analysis
Published in
Systematic Reviews, August 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13643-020-01457-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena Filipova, Stela Dineva, Katya Uzunova, Velichka Pavlova, Krassimir Kalinov, Toni Vekov

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Unknown 13 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 25%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2020.
All research outputs
#5,869,323
of 23,234,261 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#997
of 2,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,200
of 399,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#45
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,234,261 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.