| Title |
Nasopharyngeal viral load predicts hypoxemia and disease outcome in admitted COVID-19 patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03244-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amir Shlomai, Haim Ben-Zvi, Ahinoam Glusman Bendersky, Noa Shafran, Elad Goldberg, Ella H. Sklan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 448 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 109 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 23 | 5% |
| Spain | 11 | 2% |
| Israel | 9 | 2% |
| Italy | 4 | <1% |
| Ireland | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 25 | 6% |
| Unknown | 257 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 407 | 91% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 4% |
| Scientists | 14 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 27% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 267. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2021.
All research outputs
#137,631
of 25,711,194 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#55
of 6,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,298
of 426,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#5
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.