↓ Skip to main content

Belief system, meaningfulness, and psychopathology associated with suicidality among Chinese college students: a cross-sectional survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Belief system, meaningfulness, and psychopathology associated with suicidality among Chinese college students: a cross-sectional survey
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-668
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiubo Zhao, Xueling Yang, Rong Xiao, Xiaoyuan Zhang, Diane Aguilera, Jingbo Zhao

Abstract

Research suggests that Chinese religious believers are more likely to commit suicide than those identifying as non-religious among rural young adults, contrary to findings in Western countries. However, one cannot conclude that religiosity is associated with elevated suicide risk without examining the effect of political and religious beliefs in a generally atheist country like China where political belief plays a dominant role in the belief system of young adults. The present study investigated the effects of political and religious belief on suicidality with meaningfulness and psychopathology as potential mediators in a large representative sample of Chinese college students.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Australia 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Philippines 1 1%
Unknown 83 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 18%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 19 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 18%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 22 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2022.
All research outputs
#6,026,326
of 24,393,999 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,029
of 16,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,979
of 172,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#95
of 325 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,393,999 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 325 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.