↓ Skip to main content

The empathic brain and its dysfunction in psychiatric populations: implications for intervention across different clinical conditions

Overview of attention for article published in BioPsychoSocial Medicine, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 323)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
36 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
337 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
521 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The empathic brain and its dysfunction in psychiatric populations: implications for intervention across different clinical conditions
Published in
BioPsychoSocial Medicine, November 2007
DOI 10.1186/1751-0759-1-22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean Decety, Yoshiya Moriguchi

Abstract

Empathy is a concept central to psychiatry, psychotherapy and clinical psychology. The construct of empathy involves not only the affective experience of the other person's actual or inferred emotional state but also some minimal recognition and understanding of another's emotional state. It is proposed, in the light of multiple levels of analysis including social psychology, cognitive neuroscience and clinical neuropsychology, a model of empathy that involves both bottom-up and top-down information processing underpinned by parallel and distributed computational mechanisms. The predictive validity of this model is explored with reference to clinical conditions. As many psychiatric conditions are associated with deficits or even lack of empathy, we discuss a limited number of these disorders including psychopathy/antisocial personality disorders, borderline and narcissistic personality disorders, autistic spectrum disorders, and alexithymia. We argue that future clinical investigations of empathy disorders can only be informative if behavioral, dispositional and biological factors are combined.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 521 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Other 10 2%
Unknown 493 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 97 19%
Student > Master 81 16%
Student > Bachelor 71 14%
Researcher 55 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 7%
Other 101 19%
Unknown 77 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 214 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 51 10%
Neuroscience 43 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 5%
Social Sciences 22 4%
Other 68 13%
Unknown 98 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2023.
All research outputs
#685,531
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BioPsychoSocial Medicine
#10
of 323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#944
of 76,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioPsychoSocial Medicine
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them