↓ Skip to main content

Generation and evaluation of synthetic patient data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
patent
1 patent
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
167 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
271 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Generation and evaluation of synthetic patient data
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12874-020-00977-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andre Goncalves, Priyadip Ray, Braden Soper, Jennifer Stevens, Linda Coyle, Ana Paula Sales

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 271 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 16%
Student > Master 30 11%
Researcher 29 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 5%
Unspecified 13 5%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 107 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 57 21%
Engineering 30 11%
Unspecified 13 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 2%
Other 41 15%
Unknown 115 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,612,926
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#540
of 2,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,258
of 417,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#28
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.