↓ Skip to main content

Crisis-repair sequences - considerations on the classification and assessment of breaches in the therapeutic relationship

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Crisis-repair sequences - considerations on the classification and assessment of breaches in the therapeutic relationship
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-12-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antje Gumz, Elmar Brähler, Michael Geyer, Rainer Erices

Abstract

Recent research indicates that temporary deteriorations of variables monitored continuously in the course of the therapeutic relationship are important characteristics of psychotherapeutic change. These so-called rupture-repair episodes were assessed by different authors using different mathematical methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Master 8 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 51%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2012.
All research outputs
#16,402,928
of 24,164,942 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,604
of 2,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,355
of 254,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#15
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,164,942 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.