You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An evolutionary approach to Function
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Semantics, June 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/2041-1480-1-s1-s4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Phillip Lord |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
France | 1 | 5% |
Germany | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 15 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 35% |
Other | 4 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 45% |
Computer Science | 3 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 10% |
Psychology | 2 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Semantics
#155
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,104
of 104,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Semantics
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.