Title |
COVID-19 length of hospital stay: a systematic review and data synthesis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12916-020-01726-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eleanor M. Rees, Emily S. Nightingale, Yalda Jafari, Naomi R. Waterlow, Samuel Clifford, Carl A. B. Pearson, CMMID Working Group, Thibaut Jombart, Simon R. Procter, Gwenan M. Knight |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 17 | 20% |
United States | 12 | 14% |
Spain | 3 | 3% |
Australia | 2 | 2% |
Lebanon | 1 | 1% |
Thailand | 1 | 1% |
Iceland | 1 | 1% |
Austria | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Unknown | 42 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 62 | 71% |
Scientists | 17 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 840 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 840 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 96 | 11% |
Student > Master | 91 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 82 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 6% |
Other | 48 | 6% |
Other | 129 | 15% |
Unknown | 346 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 202 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 54 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 30 | 4% |
Engineering | 25 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 21 | 3% |
Other | 144 | 17% |
Unknown | 364 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 173. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2024.
All research outputs
#239,161
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#209
of 4,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,334
of 426,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#7
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.