Title |
Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) recommended CMR protocols for scanning patients with active or convalescent phase COVID-19 infection
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12968-020-00656-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sebastian Kelle, Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci, Robert M. Judd, Raymond Y. Kwong, Orlando Simonetti, Sven Plein, Francesca Raimondi, Jonathan W. Weinsaft, Timothy C. Wong, James Carr |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Argentina | 2 | 9% |
Saudi Arabia | 2 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
Italy | 2 | 9% |
United States | 2 | 9% |
Kazakhstan | 1 | 4% |
Egypt | 1 | 4% |
Russia | 1 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 61% |
Scientists | 5 | 22% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 15% |
Other | 10 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
Student > Master | 4 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 16% |
Unknown | 29 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 38% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 11% |
Unknown | 32 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,118,531
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#77
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,150
of 426,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.