You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A PET-CT study on the specificity of acupoints through acupuncture treatment in migraine patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6882-12-123 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jie Yang, Fang Zeng, Yue Feng, Li Fang, Wei Qin, Xuguang Liu, Wenzhong Song, Hongjun Xie, Ji Chen, Fanrong Liang |
Abstract |
In the field of acupuncture research, the topic of acupoint specificity has received increasing attention, but no unified conclusion has been reached on whether or not acupoint specificity exists. Furthermore, the majority of previous acupuncture neuroimaging studies have been performed using healthy subjects. In this study, patients with migraine were used to investigate acupoint specificity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 50% |
Italy | 1 | 8% |
Chile | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 119 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 26 | 21% |
Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 11% |
Other | 11 | 9% |
Researcher | 10 | 8% |
Other | 20 | 16% |
Unknown | 27 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 46% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 10% |
Psychology | 5 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 9% |
Unknown | 31 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2016.
All research outputs
#1,829,326
of 23,706,350 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#317
of 3,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,580
of 168,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#10
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,706,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.