↓ Skip to main content

Factors associated with HIV testing among male injecting drug users: findings from a cross-sectional behavioural and biological survey in Manipur and Nagaland, India

Overview of attention for article published in Harm Reduction Journal, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors associated with HIV testing among male injecting drug users: findings from a cross-sectional behavioural and biological survey in Manipur and Nagaland, India
Published in
Harm Reduction Journal, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12954-016-0110-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deepika Ganju, Sowmya Ramesh, Niranjan Saggurti

Abstract

Although targeted interventions in India require all high-risk groups, including injecting drug users (IDUs), to test for HIV every 6 months, testing uptake among IDUs remains far from universal. Our study estimates the proportion of IDUs who have taken an HIV test and identifies the factors associated with HIV testing uptake in Nagaland and Manipur, two high HIV prevalence states in India where the epidemic is driven by injecting drug use. Data are drawn from the cross-sectional Integrated Behavioural and Biological Assessment (2009) of 1650 male IDUs from two districts each of Manipur and Nagaland. Participants were recruited using respondent-driven sampling (RDS). Descriptive data were analysed using RDSAT 7.1. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was undertaken using STATA 11 to examine the association between HIV testing and socio-demographic, behavioural and programme exposure variables. One third of IDUs reported prior HIV testing, of whom 8 % had tested HIV-positive. Among those without prior testing, 6.2 % tested HIV-positive in the current survey. IDUs aged 25-34 years (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.41; 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 1.03-1.93), married (Adjusted OR = 1.56; 95 % CI = 1.15-2.12), had a paid sexual partner (Adjusted OR = 1.64; 95 % CI = 1.24-2.18), injected drugs for more than 36 months (Adjusted OR = 1.38; 95 % CI = 1.06-1.81), injected frequently (Adjusted OR = 1.49; 95 % CI = 1.12-1.98) and had high-risk perception (Adjusted OR = 1.68; 95 % CI = 1.32-2.14) were more likely than others to test for HIV. Compared to those with no programme exposure, IDUs who received counselling, or counselling and needle/syringe services, were more likely to test for HIV. HIV testing uptake among IDUs is low in Manipur and Nagaland, and a critical group of HIV-positive IDUs who have never tested for HIV are being missed by current programmes. This study identifies key sub-groups-including early initiators, short duration and less frequent injectors, perceived to be at low risk-for promoting HIV testing. Providing needles/syringes alone is not adequate to increase HIV testing; additionally, interventions must provide counselling services to inform all IDUs about HIV testing benefits, facilitate visits to testing centres and link those testing positive to timely treatment and care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 20%
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 30 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 17%
Social Sciences 10 10%
Psychology 10 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 37 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2016.
All research outputs
#12,766,240
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Harm Reduction Journal
#705
of 923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,779
of 353,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Harm Reduction Journal
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.