| Title |
A 3D-printed nasopharyngeal swab for COVID-19 diagnostic testing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
3D Printing in Medicine, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41205-020-00076-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan Ford, Todd Goldstein, Sean Trahan, Allison Neuwirth, Kyle Tatoris, Summer Decker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 57% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 42 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 20 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 19% |
| Unknown | 42 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,799,601
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from 3D Printing in Medicine
#6
of 132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,127
of 425,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from 3D Printing in Medicine
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them