You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Envisioning the future of clinical analytics: a modified Delphi process in New South Wales, Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-020-01226-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kim Sutherland, Wilson Yeung, Yoke Mak, Jean-Frederic Levesque |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 6 | 43% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Chile | 1 | 7% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Librarian | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 16 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,354,529
of 23,234,261 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#294
of 2,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,680
of 399,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#9
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,234,261 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,022 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.