↓ Skip to main content

Role of HPV 16 variants among cervical carcinoma samples from Northeastern Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Women's Health, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of HPV 16 variants among cervical carcinoma samples from Northeastern Brazil
Published in
BMC Women's Health, August 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12905-020-01035-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rodrigo Lopes da Silva, Zulmira da Silva Batista, Gerusinete Rodrigues Bastos, Ana Paula Almeida Cunha, Fábio Vidal Figueiredo, Lailson Oliveira de Castro, Liwerbeth dos Anjos Pereira, Marcos Antonio Custódio Neto da Silva, Flávia Castello Branco Vidal, Maria Claudene Barros, Elmary da Costa Fraga, Luciane Maria Oliveira Brito, Maria do Carmo Lacerda Barbosa, Miguel Ângelo Martins Moreira, Maria do Desterro Soares Brandão Nascimento

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Lecturer 2 4%
Researcher 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 30 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 30 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2020.
All research outputs
#18,743,179
of 23,234,261 outputs
Outputs from BMC Women's Health
#1,556
of 1,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,768
of 398,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Women's Health
#50
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,234,261 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.