You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing physicians’ and nurses’ experience of dying and death in the ICU: development of the CAESAR-P and the CAESAR-N instruments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03191-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Florence Boissier, Valérie Seegers, Amélie Seguin, Stéphane Legriel, Alain Cariou, Samir Jaber, Jean-Yves Lefrant, Thomas Rimmelé, Anne Renault, Isabelle Vinatier, Armelle Mathonnet, Danielle Reuter, Olivier Guisset, Christophe Cracco, Jacques Durand-Gasselin, Béatrice Éon, Marina Thirion, Jean-Philippe Rigaud, Bénédicte Philippon-Jouve, Laurent Argaud, Renaud Chouquer, Laurent Papazian, Céline Dedrie, Hugues Georges, Eddy Lebas, Nathalie Rolin, Pierre-Edouard Bollaert, Lucien Lecuyer, Gérald Viquesnel, Marc Leone, Ludivine Chalumeau-Lemoine, Maité Garrouste-Orgeas, Elie Azoulay, Nancy Kentish-Barnes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 22% |
| Unknown | 22 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 15% |
| Psychology | 5 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2020.
All research outputs
#16,733,516
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,382
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,785
of 424,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#125
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.