You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
(1,3)-β-d-Glucan-based empirical antifungal interruption in suspected invasive candidiasis: a randomized trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03265-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gennaro De Pascale, Brunella Posteraro, Sonia D’Arrigo, Giorgia Spinazzola, Rita Gaspari, Giuseppe Bello, Luca Maria Montini, Salvatore Lucio Cutuli, Domenico Luca Grieco, Valentina Di Gravio, Giulia De Angelis, Riccardo Torelli, Elena De Carolis, Mario Tumbarello, Maurizio Sanguinetti, Massimo Antonelli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 14% |
| Japan | 3 | 8% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 19% |
| Scientists | 5 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 16% |
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 35% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 15% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 20 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,949,489
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,743
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,526
of 425,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#53
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.