| Title |
Remote cardiac rehabilitation is a good alternative of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation in the COVID-19 era
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12199-020-00885-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Atsuko Nakayama, Naoko Takayama, Momoko Kobayashi, Kanako Hyodo, Naomi Maeshima, Fujiwara Takayuki, Hiroyuki Morita, Issei Komuro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 13% |
| Japan | 2 | 9% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Jamaica | 1 | 4% |
| Thailand | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 87% |
| Scientists | 2 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 192 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Researcher | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 19% |
| Unknown | 83 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 14% |
| Unknown | 96 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,014,470
of 25,011,008 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine
#71
of 540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,282
of 406,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,011,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.