You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clonal diversity and epidemiological characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus: high prevalence of oxacillin-susceptible mecA-positive Staphylococcus aureus (OS-MRSA) associated with clinical isolates in Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Microbiology, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12866-016-0733-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mariana Andrade-Figueiredo, Tereza Cristina Leal-Balbino |
| Abstract |
Staphylococcus aureus is the major cause of global and nosocomial infections with a significant impact in hospitals worldwide. Our objective was to investigate clinical and molecular characteristics of S. aureus isolates causing infections in patients admitted to hospitals from Recife city, Brazil, and investigate the prevalence of oxacillin-susceptible mecA-positive S. aureus (OS-MRSA) in the region, as well as genetically characterize the isolates and compare with epidemic clones. We characterized 89 isolates in total, 31 clinical methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and 58 methicillin-sensitive (MSSA) isolates by PFGE, MLST, spa typing and SCCmec genotyping. Isolates belonging to international MRSA clones were present: Brazilian epidemic clone (BEC) (61 % of MRSA isolates), Paediatric (36 %), New York/Japan (3 %). Some MSSA isolates were related to MRSA clones: USA400-related (10 % of MSSA isolates), Berlin clone (2 %), Paediatric (14 %), New York/Japan (2 %) and Southwest Pacific clone (17 %). MLST revealed new sequence types (ST's): ST2381, ST2382, and ST2383 and new spa types: 10548 and 10550. Among isolates phenotypically identified as MSSA by antimicrobial susceptibility assays, we verified 30 oxacillin-susceptible isolates, which exhibited the mecA gene, without mec complex amplification and were thus classified as OS-MRSA. We observed clonal spread of MRSA and MSSA, including OS-MRSA, within several areas of the main hospital investigated and closely related isolates between hospitals analyzed. The results of this study suggest a possible spread of the strains in hospital environment that could be responsible for nosocomial infections. We documented the presence of several MRSA clones, as well as new MLST and spa types, that were responsible for severe infections in hospitalized patients. The finding of OS-MRSA isolates could have implications for therapy, because testing for mecA and PBP2a is not a routine procedure performed by clinical microbiology laboratories in Brazil and, as consequence, these isolates could be misclassified as MSSA. Our data alert to the necessity to develop more effective strategies for epidemiological control of S. aureus in order to avoid an increase of hospital infections provoked by this pathogen. We reinforce the use of genetic methods, in addition to phenotypic tests, for a precise identification of MRSA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 20 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 17 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2017.
All research outputs
#18,464,797
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#2,246
of 3,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,853
of 353,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#64
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.