↓ Skip to main content

Plasma exchange in critically ill COVID-19 patients improved inflammation, microcirculatory clot formation, and hypotension, thereby improving clinical outcomes: fact or fiction?

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Plasma exchange in critically ill COVID-19 patients improved inflammation, microcirculatory clot formation, and hypotension, thereby improving clinical outcomes: fact or fiction?
Published in
Critical Care, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-03262-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick M. Honore, Leonel Barreto Gutierrez, Luc Kugener, Sebastien Redant, Rachid Attou, Andrea Gallerani, David De Bels

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 18%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 36%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2020.
All research outputs
#19,957,118
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,876
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,210
of 425,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#125
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.