↓ Skip to main content

multiDE: a dimension reduced model based statistical method for differential expression analysis using RNA-sequencing data with multiple treatment conditions

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
multiDE: a dimension reduced model based statistical method for differential expression analysis using RNA-sequencing data with multiple treatment conditions
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12859-016-1111-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guangliang Kang, Li Du, Hong Zhang

Abstract

The growing complexity of biological experiment design based on high-throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is calling for more accommodative statistical tools. We focus on differential expression (DE) analysis using RNA-seq data in the presence of multiple treatment conditions. We propose a novel method, multiDE, for facilitating DE analysis using RNA-seq read count data with multiple treatment conditions. The read count is assumed to follow a log-linear model incorporating two factors (i.e., condition and gene), where an interaction term is used to quantify the association between gene and condition. The number of the degrees of freedom is reduced to one through the first order decomposition of the interaction, leading to a dramatically power improvement in testing DE genes when the number of conditions is greater than two. In our simulation situations, multiDE outperformed the benchmark methods (i.e. edgeR and DESeq2) even if the underlying model was severely misspecified, and the power gain was increasing in the number of conditions. In the application to two real datasets, multiDE identified more biologically meaningful DE genes than the benchmark methods. An R package implementing multiDE is available publicly at http://homepage.fudan.edu.cn/zhangh/softwares/multiDE . When the number of conditions is two, multiDE performs comparably with the benchmark methods. When the number of conditions is greater than two, multiDE outperforms the benchmark methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 49 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 26%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 25%
Computer Science 5 9%
Mathematics 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 5 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2016.
All research outputs
#2,341,862
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#692
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,390
of 352,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#8
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.