You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multisensory cueing facilitates naming in aphasia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-020-00751-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Klaudia Grechuta, Belén Rubio Ballester, Rosa Espín Munné, Teresa Usabiaga Bernal, Begoña Molina Hervás, Bettina Mohr, Friedemann Pulvermüller, Rosa Maria San Segundo, Paul F. M. J. Verschure |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 30% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 55% |
| Scientists | 7 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 133 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 56 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 7% |
| Psychology | 8 | 6% |
| Linguistics | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 62 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,263,766
of 23,237,082 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#96
of 1,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,535
of 401,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#3
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,237,082 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.