You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Beyond clinical food prescriptions and mobile markets: parent views on the role of a healthcare institution in increasing healthy eating in food insecure families
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-020-00616-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily L. DeWit, Emily M. Meissen-Sebelius, Robin P. Shook, Kimberly A. Pina, Evelyn Donis De Miranda, Michelle J. Summar, Emily A. Hurley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 50% |
| Ireland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 25 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 30 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2020.
All research outputs
#18,745,728
of 23,237,082 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#1,285
of 1,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,025
of 401,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#31
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,237,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.