You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Accuracy and usefulness of BMI measures based on self-reported weight and height: findings from the NHANES & NHIS 2001-2006
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2009
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-9-421 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Manfred Stommel, Charlotte A Schoenborn |
Abstract |
The Body Mass Index (BMI) based on self-reported height and weight ("self-reported BMI") in epidemiologic studies is subject to measurement error. However, because of the ease and efficiency in gathering height and weight information through interviews, it remains important to assess the extent of error present in self-reported BMI measures and to explore possible adjustment factors as well as valid uses of such self-reported measures. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 2% |
France | 2 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Rwanda | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 263 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 45 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 37 | 13% |
Researcher | 33 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 8% |
Other | 52 | 19% |
Unknown | 47 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 27% |
Social Sciences | 28 | 10% |
Psychology | 27 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 7% |
Other | 41 | 15% |
Unknown | 66 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,659,892
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,822
of 14,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,523
of 165,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#10
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.