↓ Skip to main content

Accuracy and usefulness of BMI measures based on self-reported weight and height: findings from the NHANES

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
486 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
279 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accuracy and usefulness of BMI measures based on self-reported weight and height: findings from the NHANES & NHIS 2001-2006
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-9-421
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manfred Stommel, Charlotte A Schoenborn

Abstract

The Body Mass Index (BMI) based on self-reported height and weight ("self-reported BMI") in epidemiologic studies is subject to measurement error. However, because of the ease and efficiency in gathering height and weight information through interviews, it remains important to assess the extent of error present in self-reported BMI measures and to explore possible adjustment factors as well as valid uses of such self-reported measures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
France 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 263 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 16%
Student > Bachelor 37 13%
Researcher 33 12%
Student > Postgraduate 21 8%
Other 52 19%
Unknown 47 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 27%
Social Sciences 28 10%
Psychology 27 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 7%
Other 41 15%
Unknown 66 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,659,892
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,822
of 14,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,523
of 165,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#10
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.