You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A scoping review of policies promoting and supporting sustainable food systems in the university setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-020-00617-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amanda Grech, Eloise Howse, Sinead Boylan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Ireland | 1 | 25% |
| Belgium | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 41 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 21% |
| Unknown | 42 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2022.
All research outputs
#995,584
of 23,563,389 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#281
of 1,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,080
of 402,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#4
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,563,389 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.