↓ Skip to main content

The impact of body mass index on short-term surgical outcomes after laparoscopic hepatectomy, a retrospective study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of body mass index on short-term surgical outcomes after laparoscopic hepatectomy, a retrospective study
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12871-016-0194-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xin Yu, Hong Yu, Xiangming Fang

Abstract

Surgeons may expect technical difficulties and worse outcomes when performing laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) on obese patients. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of body mass index (BMI) on short-term surgical outcomes and to verify risk factors of conversion rate and complications of LH. Data were collected from 551 patients who underwent attempted LH between August 1998 and April 2013. Patients were classified into four groups depending on their BMI according to the WHO's definition of obesity for Asia-Pacific region: underweight <18.5 kg/m(2) (Group1); normal 18.5-23.9 kg/m(2) (Group2); overweight 24-27.9 kg/m(2) (Group3); obese ≥ 28 kg/m(2) (Group4) respectively. Short-term surgical outcomes were compared across the BMI categories. Possible risk factors concerned conversion rate and complications were analyzed. The overall conversion rate of the 551 patients was 13.07 %. Conversion rate for Group 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 14.3 % (n = 5), 11.2 % (n = 38), 13.0 % (n = 19), and 34.5 % (n = 10) respectively. Patients within the obese group had a much higher conversion rate. The overall complications rate was 11.98 %, where the complication for Group 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 22.9 % (n = 8), 12.7 % (n = 43), 18.2 % (n = 12), and 10.3 % (n = 3) respectively. Patients within the underweight group had a higher complication rate, but it did not reach statistic difference. Obesity and surgical site of left lobe were independent risk factors of conversion. Age, abdominal surgery history, and type of left and right lobe resection were independent risk factors for complications. In China, obesity increases risk of conversion rate but it dose not affect surgical complications and other short-outcomes after LH.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Unknown 10 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2016.
All research outputs
#20,334,427
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#1,175
of 1,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#291,968
of 339,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,498 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.