↓ Skip to main content

Time needed to achieve completeness and accuracy in bedside lung ultrasound reporting in Intensive Care Unit

Overview of attention for article published in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Time needed to achieve completeness and accuracy in bedside lung ultrasound reporting in Intensive Care Unit
Published in
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, January 2010
DOI 10.1186/1757-7241-18-44
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lorenzo Tutino, Giovanni Cianchi, Francesco Barbani, Stefano Batacchi, Rita Cammelli, Adriano Peris

Abstract

The use of lung ultrasound (LUS) in ICU is increasing but ultrasonographic patterns of lung are often difficult to quantify by different operators. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and quality of LUS reporting after the introduction of a standardized electronic recording sheet.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 16%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Postgraduate 6 14%
Other 5 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 74%
Computer Science 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2012.
All research outputs
#11,080,318
of 12,461,987 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#737
of 782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,877
of 124,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,461,987 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.