You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
What should community organisations consider when deciding to partner with researchers? A critical reflection on the Zilla Budakattu Girijana Abhivrudhhi Sangha experience in Karnataka, India
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12961-020-00617-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bridget Pratt, Tanya Seshadri, Prashanth N. Srinivas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 7 | 28% |
Switzerland | 2 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
Curaçao | 1 | 4% |
South Africa | 1 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Nepal | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 44% |
Scientists | 8 | 32% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 15% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,116,113
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#259
of 1,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,730
of 427,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#6
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.