↓ Skip to main content

Latency: the hidden HIV-1 challenge

Overview of attention for article published in Retrovirology, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Latency: the hidden HIV-1 challenge
Published in
Retrovirology, January 2006
DOI 10.1186/1742-4690-3-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandro Marcello

Abstract

Eradication of HIV-1 from an infected individual cannot be achieved by current regimens. Viral reservoirs established early during the infection remain unaffected by anti-retroviral therapy for a long time and are able to replenish systemic infection upon interruption of the treatment. Therapeutic targeting of viral latency will require a better understanding of the basic mechanisms underlying the establishment and long-term maintenance of HIV-1 in resting memory CD4 T cells, the most prominent reservoir of transcriptionally silent provirus. Since the molecular mechanisms that permit long term transcriptional control of proviral gene expression in these cells are still obscure, this review aims at summarizing the various aspects of the problem that need to be considered. In particular, this review will focus the attention on the control of transcription imposed by chromatin through various epigenetic mechanisms. Exploring the molecular details of viral latency will provide new insights for eventual future therapeutics that aim at viral eradication.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 93 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 31%
Researcher 20 20%
Student > Master 14 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 9 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2016.
All research outputs
#4,572,822
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Retrovirology
#216
of 1,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,416
of 155,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Retrovirology
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.