↓ Skip to main content

Factors influencing the use of video interpretation compared to in-person interpretation in hospitals: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors influencing the use of video interpretation compared to in-person interpretation in hospitals: a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12913-020-05720-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eli Feiring, Stine Westdahl

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 29 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 13%
Unspecified 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 32 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,350,483
of 25,802,847 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,477
of 8,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,414
of 427,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#36
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,802,847 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.