↓ Skip to main content

Biodiversity, traditional medicine and public health: where do they meet?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 776)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
290 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
673 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
3 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biodiversity, traditional medicine and public health: where do they meet?
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, March 2007
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-3-14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rômulo RN Alves, Ierecê ML Rosa

Abstract

Given the increased use of traditional medicines, possibilities that would ensure its successful integration into a public health framework should be explored. This paper discusses some of the links between biodiversity and traditional medicine, and addresses their implications to public health. We explore the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to global and human health, the risks which human impacts on ecosystems and biodiversity present to human health and welfare.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 673 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 12 2%
Japan 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Zimbabwe 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
Other 11 2%
Unknown 638 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 100 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 98 15%
Student > Bachelor 82 12%
Researcher 64 10%
Student > Postgraduate 32 5%
Other 124 18%
Unknown 173 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 187 28%
Environmental Science 66 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 7%
Social Sciences 38 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 28 4%
Other 117 17%
Unknown 193 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2022.
All research outputs
#817,831
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#14
of 776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,326
of 88,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them