↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of a 'Global Postural Reeducation' program for persistent Low Back Pain: a non-randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
292 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of a 'Global Postural Reeducation' program for persistent Low Back Pain: a non-randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-11-285
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesca Bonetti, Stefania Curti, Stefano Mattioli, Raffaele Mugnai, Carla Vanti, Francesco S Violante, Paolo Pillastrini

Abstract

The aim of this non-randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of a Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) program as compared to a Stabilization Exercise (SE) program in subjects with persistent low back pain (LBP) at short- and mid-term follow-up (ie. 3 and 6 months).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 278 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 62 21%
Student > Master 60 21%
Student > Postgraduate 25 9%
Researcher 18 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 5%
Other 61 21%
Unknown 50 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 113 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 58 20%
Sports and Recreations 19 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Other 24 8%
Unknown 63 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2019.
All research outputs
#3,938,184
of 16,309,331 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#771
of 3,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,674
of 133,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,309,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them