You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What works, why and how? A scoping review and logic model of rural clinical placements for allied health students
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-020-05669-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Moran, Susan Nancarrow, Catherine Cosgrave, Anna Griffith, Rhiannon Memery |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 8 | 35% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 22% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 61% |
| Scientists | 4 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 25% |
| Unknown | 23 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 27 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,275,415
of 25,019,109 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#896
of 8,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,291
of 409,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#28
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,019,109 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.