You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Challenges in evaluating Welfare to Work policy interventions: would an RCT design have been the answer to all our problems?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-254 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathryn Skivington, Gerry McCartney, Hilary Thomson, Lyndal Bond |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 64 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 22% |
| Researcher | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Librarian | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 17 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,875,290
of 23,873,907 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,244
of 15,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,716
of 96,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#43
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,873,907 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.