You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Growth faltering in early infancy: highlights from a two-day scientific consultation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Proceedings, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12919-020-00195-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Satinder Aneja, Praveen Kumar, Tarun Shankar Choudhary, Akanksha Srivastava, Ranadip Chowdhury, Sunita Taneja, Nita Bhandari, Abner Daniel, Purnima Menon, Harish Chellani, Rajiv Bahl, Maharaj Kishan Bhan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 30% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 29 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,243,157
of 23,237,082 outputs
Outputs from BMC Proceedings
#41
of 376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,455
of 402,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Proceedings
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,237,082 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 376 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them