| Title |
MyCites: a proposal to mark and report inaccurate citations in scholarly publications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Integrity and Peer Review, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41073-020-00099-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohammad Hosseini, Martin Paul Eve, Bert Gordijn, Cameron Neylon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 21% |
| United States | 8 | 15% |
| Ireland | 3 | 6% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 57% |
| Scientists | 14 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Librarian | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 14% |
| Psychology | 2 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2021.
All research outputs
#883,520
of 25,554,853 outputs
Outputs from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#41
of 133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,159
of 429,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,554,853 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 76.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.