You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Colon capsule endoscopy versus CT colonography in FIT-positive colorectal cancer screening subjects: a prospective randomised trial—the VICOCA study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-020-01717-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Begoña González-Suárez, Mario Pagés, Isis Karina Araujo, Cristina Romero, Cristina Rodríguez de Miguel, Juan Ramón Ayuso, Àngels Pozo, Maria Vila-Casadesús, Anna Serradesanferm, Àngels Ginès, Glòria Fernández-Esparrach, Maria Pellisé, María López-Cerón, David Flores, Henry Córdova, Oriol Sendino, Jaume Grau, Josep Llach, Miquel Serra-Burriel, Andrés Cárdenas, Francesc Balaguer, Antoni Castells |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 9 | 69% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 32 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,775,815
of 23,237,082 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,978
of 3,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,546
of 408,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#57
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,237,082 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.