You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Physical activity and neurocognitive functioning in aging - a condensed updated review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Review of Aging and Physical Activity, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s11556-016-0161-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrick D. Gajewski, Michael Falkenstein |
| Abstract |
This condensed review gives an overview about two methodological approaches to study the impact of physical activity on cognition in elderly, namely cross-sectional studies and randomized controlled intervention studies with pre- and post-measures. Moreover, this review includes studies investigating different types of physical activity and their relation to cognitive functions in older age. Behavioral data are considered but the main focus lies on neuroscientific methods like event-related potentials (ERPs) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 250 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 11% |
| Researcher | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 8% |
| Other | 44 | 17% |
| Unknown | 62 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 49 | 19% |
| Sports and Recreations | 29 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 25 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 14% |
| Unknown | 72 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2017.
All research outputs
#2,544,176
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from European Review of Aging and Physical Activity
#31
of 166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,189
of 401,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Review of Aging and Physical Activity
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them