You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improving treatment decision-making in bipolar II disorder: a phase II randomised controlled trial of an online patient decision-aid
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12888-020-02845-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alana Fisher, Rachael Keast, Daniel Costa, Louise Sharpe, Vijaya Manicavasagar, Josephine Anderson, Ilona Juraskova |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 8 | 73% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 45 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 22 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 47 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,775,815
of 23,237,082 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#1,424
of 4,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,468
of 407,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#30
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,237,082 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,800 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.