You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Perception of the relative harm of electronic cigarettes compared to cigarettes amongst US adults from 2013 to 2016: analysis of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Harm Reduction Journal, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12954-020-00410-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Layla Malt, Thomas Verron, Xavier Cahours, Mengran Guo, Sarah Weaver, Tanvir Walele, Grant O’Connell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 161 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 48 | 30% |
| Australia | 14 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 4% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| Philippines | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Georgia | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 67 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 139 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 7% |
| Scientists | 6 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 18 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 5 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 20 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2024.
All research outputs
#418,634
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Harm Reduction Journal
#70
of 1,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,557
of 431,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Harm Reduction Journal
#3
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.