| Title |
Clinicians perceptions of a telemedicine system: a mixed method study of Makassar City, Indonesia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-020-01234-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dea Indria, Mohannad Alajlani, Hamish S F Fraser |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 231 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 15% |
| Unknown | 115 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 20 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 11% |
| Unknown | 117 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,275,238
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#379
of 2,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,241
of 407,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#11
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,022 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.