↓ Skip to main content

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance evaluation of aortic stenosis severity using single plane measurement of effective orifice area

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Taylor & Francis Ltd), April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance evaluation of aortic stenosis severity using single plane measurement of effective orifice area
Published in
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Taylor & Francis Ltd), April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-14-23
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julio Garcia, Oscar R Marrufo, Alfredo O Rodriguez, Eric Larose, Philippe Pibarot, Lyes Kadem

Abstract

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the standard method for the evaluation of the severity of aortic stenosis (AS). Valve effective orifice area (EOA) measured by the continuity equation is one of the most frequently used stenotic indices. However, TTE measurement of aortic valve EOA is not feasible or not reliable in a significant proportion of patients. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has emerged as a non-invasive alternative to evaluate EOA using velocity measurements. The objectives of this study were: 1) to validate a new CMR method using jet shear layer detection (JSLD) based on acoustical source term (AST) concept to estimate the valve EOA; 2) to introduce a simplified JSLD method not requiring vorticity field derivation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 4%
Spain 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 42 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 27%
Researcher 9 19%
Other 7 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 50%
Engineering 13 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Unknown 6 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2012.
All research outputs
#9,476,792
of 12,374,128 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Taylor & Francis Ltd)
#658
of 811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,372
of 126,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (Taylor & Francis Ltd)
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,374,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.