↓ Skip to main content

Innate immune defects in HIV permissive cell lines

Overview of attention for article published in Retrovirology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Innate immune defects in HIV permissive cell lines
Published in
Retrovirology, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12977-016-0275-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Rausell, Miguel Muñoz, Raquel Martinez, Thierry Roger, Amalio Telenti, Angela Ciuffi

Abstract

Primary CD4+ T cells and cell lines differ in their permissiveness to HIV infection. Impaired innate immunity may contribute to this different phenotype. We used transcriptome profiling of 1503 innate immunity genes in primary CD4+ T cells and permissive cell lines. Two clusters of differentially expressed genes were identified: a set of 249 genes that were highly expressed in primary cells and minimally expressed in cell lines and a set of 110 genes with the opposite pattern. Specific to HIV, HEK293T, Jurkat, SupT1 and CEM cell lines displayed unique patterns of downregulation of genes involved in viral sensing and restriction. Activation of primary CD4+ T cells resulted in reversal of the pattern of expression of those sets of innate immunity genes. Functional analysis of prototypical innate immunity pathways of permissive cell lines confirmed impaired responses identified in transcriptome analyses. Integrity of innate immunity genes and pathways needs to be considered in designing gain/loss functional genomic screens of viral infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 24%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 26%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Chemical Engineering 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 16 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2023.
All research outputs
#5,213,650
of 24,575,707 outputs
Outputs from Retrovirology
#238
of 1,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,167
of 359,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Retrovirology
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,575,707 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.