↓ Skip to main content

Using patients’ experiences to identify priorities for quality improvement in breast cancer care: patient narratives, surveys or both?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using patients’ experiences to identify priorities for quality improvement in breast cancer care: patient narratives, surveys or both?
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-271
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vicki Tsianakas, Jill Maben, Theresa Wiseman, Glenn Robert, Alison Richardson, Peter Madden, Mairead Griffin, Elizabeth A Davies

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 220 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 15%
Researcher 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Other 12 5%
Other 41 18%
Unknown 56 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 15%
Social Sciences 22 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 16 7%
Design 10 4%
Other 36 16%
Unknown 67 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2016.
All research outputs
#7,455,082
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,563
of 8,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,686
of 190,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#36
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.