↓ Skip to main content

Clinical review: use of venous oxygen saturations as a goal - a yet unfinished puzzle

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical review: use of venous oxygen saturations as a goal - a yet unfinished puzzle
Published in
Critical Care, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/cc10351
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul van Beest, Götz Wietasch, Thomas Scheeren, Peter Spronk, Michaël Kuiper

Abstract

Shock is defined as global tissue hypoxia secondary to an imbalance between systemic oxygen delivery and oxygen demand. Venous oxygen saturations represent this relationship between oxygen delivery and oxygen demand and can therefore be used as an additional parameter to detect an impaired cardiorespiratory reserve. Before appropriate use of venous oxygen saturations, however, one should be aware of the physiology. Although venous oxygen saturation has been the subject of research for many years, increasing interest arose especially in the past decade for its use as a therapeutic goal in critically ill patients and during the perioperative period. Also, there has been debate on differences between mixed and central venous oxygen saturation and their interchangeability. Both mixed and central venous oxygen saturation are clinically useful but both variables should be used with insightful knowledge and caution. In general, low values warn the clinician about cardiocirculatory or metabolic impairment and should urge further diagnostics and appropriate action, whereas normal or high values do not rule out persistent tissue hypoxia. The use of venous oxygen saturations seems especially useful in the early phase of disease or injury. Whether venous oxygen saturations should be measured continuously remains unclear. Especially, continuous measurement of central venous oxygen saturation as part of the treatment protocol has been shown a valuable strategy in the emergency department and in cardiac surgery. In clinical practice, venous oxygen saturations should always be used in combination with vital signs and other relevant endpoints.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 196 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 33 16%
Student > Postgraduate 31 15%
Researcher 25 12%
Student > Master 24 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Other 47 23%
Unknown 25 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 132 65%
Engineering 15 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Unspecified 4 2%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 34 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,140,947
of 25,391,701 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,948
of 6,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,942
of 152,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#16
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,701 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.