You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Non-destructive phenotyping for early seedling vigor in direct-seeded rice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-020-00666-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Annamalai Anandan, Anumalla Mahender, Rameswar Prasad Sah, Lotan Kumar Bose, Hatanath Subudhi, Jitendra Meher, Janga Nagi Reddy, Jauhar Ali |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Philippines | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2020.
All research outputs
#13,459,906
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#617
of 1,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,795
of 408,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#21
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.