↓ Skip to main content

Increased therapeutic efficacy of combination of azithromycin and ceftazidime on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm in an animal model of ureteral stent infection

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Increased therapeutic efficacy of combination of azithromycin and ceftazidime on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm in an animal model of ureteral stent infection
Published in
BMC Microbiology, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12866-016-0744-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xianfeng Wang, Yongqing Cai, Haiyan Xing, Wei Wu, Guanying Wang, Ling Li, Jianhong Chen

Abstract

Infection caused by ureteral stent indwelling is one of the most difficult medical problems, since once bacteria reside in biofilms they are extremely resistant to antibiotics as well as to the host immune defences. In this study we assessed the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of azithromycin and ceftazidime in preventing ureteral stent infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The susceptibility testing with adherent bacteria showed that the biofilm was strongly inhibited by azithromycin treatment, ceftazidime against adherent bacteria in the presence of azithromycin showed the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimum bacteriocidal concentrations (MBCs) dramatically lower than those obtained in the absence of azithromycin. Moreover, ceftazidime plus azithromycin reduced twitching motility and production of rhamnolipid. For the single-treatment groups, in vivo intravenous injection of ceftazidime showed the highest inhibitory effect on bacterial load. Azithromycin prophylactic injection combined with ceftazidime showed increased inhibitory effect on bacterial load than that of each single antibiotic. Combination of azithromycin and ceftazidime effectively prevent the formation of biofilm and reduced bacteria load of Pseudomonas aeruginosa compared to separate treatment of either of these two antibiotics. This combined treatment option have the potential to contribute to the success of Pseudomonas biofilm elimination in the clinical environment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 15 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 14 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2016.
All research outputs
#14,856,117
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#1,602
of 3,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,945
of 352,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#47
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.